Engadget HD goes hands-on with ZeeVee's ZvBox
Filed under: HDTV, Home Entertainment
Relevant Posts
- Engadget HD reviews ZeeVee's ZvBox (21 days ago - 0 Comments)
- Popcorn Hour's A-110 HD media streamer / B-110 motherboard reviewed (57 days ago - 12 Comments)
- Blusens offers up Blu:Brain HD media server (6 days ago - 8 Comments)
- Nikon D90 unboxing and hands-on (11 days ago - 49 Comments)
- PIE United cranks out HD-0310 1080p Digital Photo Viewer (10 days ago - 14 Comments)
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
OneLove @ Aug 4th 2008 11:03AM
no one likes ZeeVee's ZvBox?
Jon @ Aug 4th 2008 12:09PM
I have done a lot of research on this thing but it comes down to No one like $499 ... $149-199 and i am sold ...
Olivier @ Aug 4th 2008 1:09PM
I am underwhelmd by this thing. My Slingbox works fine and I can watch TV anywhere outside my home.
For the same price you can get a mac mini under your tv which will do any of this. (yes including "screen casting" from another PC in your house running VLC screen capture)
$500 is just plain dumb. Either they are making too fat of a margin either the component prices are just too high and selling this to the public just doesn't make economic sense.
Watch out for $99 promotion at Woot in 6 months for this deice
brian @ Aug 4th 2008 2:08PM
Olivier:
Do you really want to buy 3 mac minis to cover all the TVs in your house? Do you really want yet another STB cluttering up your living room? ZvBox works across coax and allows you to watch Internet or local media on any HDTV in the house. There is nothing in the living room but a sexy, new multi-media ZvRemote. ZvBox is spouse-proof!
:-)
-Brian from ZeeVee
ChillyCat @ Aug 4th 2008 1:54PM
They'll be scraping inches of dust off these in no time.
No way it'll sell anywhere near 5 bills.
Overstock - dot - com future skew.
rodalpho @ Aug 4th 2008 2:58PM
I don't think I'd go quite [i]that[/i] far. Video distribution over QAM is a neat idea, and it'll sell for custom installations where the price won't be an issue. I like the remote design, too. Problems:
1) Price is too high for consumers to swallow. Popcornhour is $200, mac mini with OSXBMC is $500.
2) Moving data from the PC to the TV isn't a big win anymore due to wireless 802.11, particularly 802.11N. The only advantage is that it's broadcasting (within your house, anyway) versus narrowcasting. You don't need client hardware at your TV, just a QAM tuner.
3) ... but many HDTVs don't have QAM tuners these days.
ds @ Aug 4th 2008 3:05PM
Ok let's get a couple of things straight. To do what this box does would cost well over $1,000 if you went with alternate hardware. $500 is a bargain for what this thing can do. Anyone thinking they could get similar functions from anything near this price point are wrong.
The problem really is that few people would get a lot of value out of this thing because the value you get is directly dependent on the number of HDTVs in your home. I really can't see anyone without 3+ HDTVs considering this device. If you just have 1 there is no purpose. If you have 2, then it could definitely be useful; but for $500 people would rather buy a media box specifically for that TV. 3 or more HDTVs and you start realizing how much this device could save you in buying additional devices for each TV.
I could go on, but I guess that was my point. Target audience is really 3+ HDTV homes which puts it currently in the niche category, but for those people it really has amazing potential.
BagOfArms @ Aug 4th 2008 3:46PM
Screw the box. I just want the remote! For $130 you get an RF remote WITH a trackpad that's already setup to work with Windows (no pesky programming buttons to actions, etc.). The keyboard looks nice, too, but we don't know how much that is yet.
rodalpho @ Aug 4th 2008 4:23PM
That's a good point. I would seriously consider buying that remote if it also worked as a learning IR remote for my receiver, TiVo, etc. The remote is cool lookin'.